<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Campaign For Better Transport</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bettertransport.org.nz/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bettertransport.org.nz</link>
	<description>Better Transport for the 21st Century</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 22:40:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Just Get It In by Graham Bush</title>
		<link>http://www.bettertransport.org.nz/2012/07/just-get-it-in/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Bush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 22:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bettertransport.org.nz/?p=1820#comment-162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A particular problem with the non-issuing of paper tickets on trains relates to the non-issuing of tickets to senior citizens who show their gold cards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A particular problem with the non-issuing of paper tickets on trains relates to the non-issuing of tickets to senior citizens who show their gold cards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Election 2011: The Future of Auckland&#8217;s Transport by thewayforward2011</title>
		<link>http://www.bettertransport.org.nz/2011/10/election-2011-the-future-of-aucklands-transport/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>thewayforward2011</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 07:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bettertransport.org.nz/?p=1744#comment-147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alan Preston here for Save Our Rail Northland and other communities around New Zealand working for sustainable transport solutions appropriate to the post peak oil age ( - which we have all been living in since 2006 ( International Energy Agency, May 2011 ).

( The following e-mail (with hyper-links intact) was sent out to all Candidates in Labour/Greens and to media on the 30th of October 2011. It would be useful if someone could confront the National Party candidate with the following and to ask how their approach to provision of ( or deprivation of ) transport infrastructure is consistant with the IEA&#039;s latest assertions.
( to view this e-mail with links, please go to:
https://sites.google.com/site/saveourrailnorthland/home/resources/the-bolland-report/letter-to-media-and-mps-re-bolland-report

The National Government of New Zealand is currently pursuing its &#039;Roads of &#039;National&#039; Significance and the KiwiRail Turnaround plan - which includes the &#039;rationalisation&#039; of 5 regional railway lines, thereby increasing New Zealand&#039;s vulnerability, decreasing our resilience and contravening our obligations to reduce our greenhouse-gas emissions in accordance with the Kyoto Protocol.

We have recently succeeded in using the Official Information Act to secure the release of the 2009 Ministerial Briefing on Oil Prices and Transport Sector Resilience
and the The Bolland Report which was commissioned in April 2010 by the Ministry of Transport to provide independent advice on the economic costs and benifits of rail freight.
The latter document found significant economic benefits for rail over road for freight transport and the former warns of our vulnerability caused by our dependence on fossil fuels and lack of alternative sources of energy and oil non-dependent infrastructure.
These are only two of many documents we have that substantiate and validate the case for an urgent review of the National-led government&#039;s approach to the provision of transport infrastructure, in light of the (usually ultra-conservative ) International Energy Agency&#039;s assertion that the fossil-fuel energy paradigm has changed, and that &#039;the age of cheap oil is over&#039;.
What is extremely concerning is that the Official Information Act was used to deny acccess to information that should have been made available to the public as part of a consultation process to design strategies that will ensure New Zealanders are able to respond appropriately to continue functioning as a society and as an economy in this new energy future.

In early 2011 the International Energy Agency, of which New Zealand is one of 28 sponsor nations, completed a study of 800 of the world&#039;s oil fields and concluded that the peak in &#039;conventional&#039; oil actually occurred in 2006 and that &#039;unconventional&#039; energy from gas and tar-sands would never make up the shortfall in production as demand from India and China increases.
In interviews with media ( Radio NZ National 25th May 2011) ,Chief Economist from the IEA , Fatih Birol concluded that &#039;the age of cheap oil is over&#039; and that governments need to urgently reduce their vulnerability to ever-increasingly expensive oil prices and to oil shocks.

The Acting Minister of Energy, Hekia Parata , by her reply to our enquiry ( 21st of June 2011  as to how the National-led Government was going to respond to the International Energy Agency&#039;s recent assertions, only repeated their belief that&quot; new fields and unconventional sources will ensure that demand continues to be met. &quot;
thereby showing that she was oblivious to what the IEA had said, that:  &#039;unconventional&#039; energy from gas and tar-sands would never make up the shortfall in production as demand from India and China increases&#039; - and that to maintain the status quo , the world will need another 4 Saudi Arabias before 2030. &#039;A very tall order&#039; ( Fatih Birol ).

What has also been of  great concern to New Zealanders involved in advocating for more appropriate energy, transport and climate change responses is that our media organisations and elected representatives seem to be collectively extremely reluctant to deal with these issues.

We trust that at this pre-election juncture , you will understand the gravity of this issue and give it the exposure it deserves.

Alan Preston
Save Our Rail Northland.

====================================
or contact Alan Preston  in Mangawhai, Northland
    Tel: +64 9 4315389      
    e-mail  @ e-mail:saveourrailnorthland@gmail.com
   web-site: http://www.saveourrailnorthland.org.nz
    see also:  www.thewayforward2011.org.nz]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan Preston here for Save Our Rail Northland and other communities around New Zealand working for sustainable transport solutions appropriate to the post peak oil age ( &#8211; which we have all been living in since 2006 ( International Energy Agency, May 2011 ).</p>
<p>( The following e-mail (with hyper-links intact) was sent out to all Candidates in Labour/Greens and to media on the 30th of October 2011. It would be useful if someone could confront the National Party candidate with the following and to ask how their approach to provision of ( or deprivation of ) transport infrastructure is consistant with the IEA&#8217;s latest assertions.<br />
( to view this e-mail with links, please go to:<br />
<a href="https://sites.google.com/site/saveourrailnorthland/home/resources/the-bolland-report/letter-to-media-and-mps-re-bolland-report" rel="nofollow">https://sites.google.com/site/saveourrailnorthland/home/resources/the-bolland-report/letter-to-media-and-mps-re-bolland-report</a></p>
<p>The National Government of New Zealand is currently pursuing its &#8216;Roads of &#8216;National&#8217; Significance and the KiwiRail Turnaround plan &#8211; which includes the &#8216;rationalisation&#8217; of 5 regional railway lines, thereby increasing New Zealand&#8217;s vulnerability, decreasing our resilience and contravening our obligations to reduce our greenhouse-gas emissions in accordance with the Kyoto Protocol.</p>
<p>We have recently succeeded in using the Official Information Act to secure the release of the 2009 Ministerial Briefing on Oil Prices and Transport Sector Resilience<br />
and the The Bolland Report which was commissioned in April 2010 by the Ministry of Transport to provide independent advice on the economic costs and benifits of rail freight.<br />
The latter document found significant economic benefits for rail over road for freight transport and the former warns of our vulnerability caused by our dependence on fossil fuels and lack of alternative sources of energy and oil non-dependent infrastructure.<br />
These are only two of many documents we have that substantiate and validate the case for an urgent review of the National-led government&#8217;s approach to the provision of transport infrastructure, in light of the (usually ultra-conservative ) International Energy Agency&#8217;s assertion that the fossil-fuel energy paradigm has changed, and that &#8216;the age of cheap oil is over&#8217;.<br />
What is extremely concerning is that the Official Information Act was used to deny acccess to information that should have been made available to the public as part of a consultation process to design strategies that will ensure New Zealanders are able to respond appropriately to continue functioning as a society and as an economy in this new energy future.</p>
<p>In early 2011 the International Energy Agency, of which New Zealand is one of 28 sponsor nations, completed a study of 800 of the world&#8217;s oil fields and concluded that the peak in &#8216;conventional&#8217; oil actually occurred in 2006 and that &#8216;unconventional&#8217; energy from gas and tar-sands would never make up the shortfall in production as demand from India and China increases.<br />
In interviews with media ( Radio NZ National 25th May 2011) ,Chief Economist from the IEA , Fatih Birol concluded that &#8216;the age of cheap oil is over&#8217; and that governments need to urgently reduce their vulnerability to ever-increasingly expensive oil prices and to oil shocks.</p>
<p>The Acting Minister of Energy, Hekia Parata , by her reply to our enquiry ( 21st of June 2011  as to how the National-led Government was going to respond to the International Energy Agency&#8217;s recent assertions, only repeated their belief that&#8221; new fields and unconventional sources will ensure that demand continues to be met. &#8221;<br />
thereby showing that she was oblivious to what the IEA had said, that:  &#8216;unconventional&#8217; energy from gas and tar-sands would never make up the shortfall in production as demand from India and China increases&#8217; &#8211; and that to maintain the status quo , the world will need another 4 Saudi Arabias before 2030. &#8216;A very tall order&#8217; ( Fatih Birol ).</p>
<p>What has also been of  great concern to New Zealanders involved in advocating for more appropriate energy, transport and climate change responses is that our media organisations and elected representatives seem to be collectively extremely reluctant to deal with these issues.</p>
<p>We trust that at this pre-election juncture , you will understand the gravity of this issue and give it the exposure it deserves.</p>
<p>Alan Preston<br />
Save Our Rail Northland.</p>
<p>====================================<br />
or contact Alan Preston  in Mangawhai, Northland<br />
    Tel: +64 9 4315389<br />
    e-mail  @ e-mail:saveourrailnorthland@gmail.com<br />
   web-site: <a href="http://www.saveourrailnorthland.org.nz" rel="nofollow">http://www.saveourrailnorthland.org.nz</a><br />
    see also:  <a href="http://www.thewayforward2011.org.nz" rel="nofollow">http://www.thewayforward2011.org.nz</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Brian Rudman: Cheap won&#8217;t be a bargain for Auckland&#8217;s new rail system by Gerd Kattn</title>
		<link>http://www.bettertransport.org.nz/2009/08/brian-rudman-cheap-wont-be-a-bargain-for-aucklands-new-rail-system/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerd Kattn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 03:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bettertransport.org.nz/?p=745#comment-146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My experience in Philadelphia, PA USA  with the Frankford Elavated trains is that the standardization of track size is a paramount concern.  The riveted steel truss structure of Frankford Elavated (a supposedly temporary construction completed in 1929 was successfully reinforced while in operation over a number of years.  The big glitch occured when the Budd Company cars (manufactured in Philadelphia) were replaced with cars which Unfortunately needed to be modified to accept a non-standard track size, making them heavier and slower.  Electric rail might  be a post mature industry since speeds over (sorry for the SAE) 100 miles per hour seem energy deficient.  If America could get some inflation (post-Keynesian economic success) going, maybe NZ could buy American.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My experience in Philadelphia, PA USA  with the Frankford Elavated trains is that the standardization of track size is a paramount concern.  The riveted steel truss structure of Frankford Elavated (a supposedly temporary construction completed in 1929 was successfully reinforced while in operation over a number of years.  The big glitch occured when the Budd Company cars (manufactured in Philadelphia) were replaced with cars which Unfortunately needed to be modified to accept a non-standard track size, making them heavier and slower.  Electric rail might  be a post mature industry since speeds over (sorry for the SAE) 100 miles per hour seem energy deficient.  If America could get some inflation (post-Keynesian economic success) going, maybe NZ could buy American.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Brian Rudman: Cheap won&#8217;t be a bargain for Auckland&#8217;s new rail system by Gerd Kattn</title>
		<link>http://www.bettertransport.org.nz/2009/08/brian-rudman-cheap-wont-be-a-bargain-for-aucklands-new-rail-system/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerd Kattn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 02:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bettertransport.org.nz/?p=745#comment-145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can bicycles be transported aboard  Bike-On-Rail ?  All day and night ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can bicycles be transported aboard  Bike-On-Rail ?  All day and night ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CBT AGM 12 July by Truth Seeker</title>
		<link>http://www.bettertransport.org.nz/2011/07/cbt-agm-12-july/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Truth Seeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bettertransport.org.nz/?p=1679#comment-139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really enjoyed the AGM. Good talk by Mike Lee. :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really enjoyed the AGM. Good talk by Mike Lee. <img src='http://www.bettertransport.org.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Government has No Plan for High Oil Prices by exitlane</title>
		<link>http://www.bettertransport.org.nz/2011/03/government-has-no-plan-for-high-oil-prices/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>exitlane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 06:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bettertransport.org.nz/?p=1618#comment-136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[just sound economic management is sufficient motivation surely...
just released figures from the Parliament Research Unit  show that every US$1 increase in the price of oil wipes around $45 million off New Zealand&#039;s GDP. Since October 2010 the oil price has risen by US$38 ($80-$118). 

&quot;In just 4 months the oil quake has already sliced close to $2 billion off our GDP. ... and even more if the NZ dollar falls against the US dollar.

The real crunch is what high oil prices do to kiwi’s discretionary spending. The figures show that between $23 million to $33 million of household spending is lost for each $US1 rise in the oil price. That&#039;s over $1 billion NZ effectively whipped out of Kiwi’s wallets since last October.  Again the situation gets worse if the NZ dollar drops against the US.&quot;

http://oilshockhorrorprobe.blogspot.com/2011/03/earthquake-nz5-billion-oil-quake-more.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just sound economic management is sufficient motivation surely&#8230;<br />
just released figures from the Parliament Research Unit  show that every US$1 increase in the price of oil wipes around $45 million off New Zealand&#8217;s GDP. Since October 2010 the oil price has risen by US$38 ($80-$118). </p>
<p>&#8220;In just 4 months the oil quake has already sliced close to $2 billion off our GDP. &#8230; and even more if the NZ dollar falls against the US dollar.</p>
<p>The real crunch is what high oil prices do to kiwi’s discretionary spending. The figures show that between $23 million to $33 million of household spending is lost for each $US1 rise in the oil price. That&#8217;s over $1 billion NZ effectively whipped out of Kiwi’s wallets since last October.  Again the situation gets worse if the NZ dollar drops against the US.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://oilshockhorrorprobe.blogspot.com/2011/03/earthquake-nz5-billion-oil-quake-more.html" rel="nofollow">http://oilshockhorrorprobe.blogspot.com/2011/03/earthquake-nz5-billion-oil-quake-more.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rod Oram Exposes Economic Fallacy of Puford Toll Road by Release of CBD Rail Link Business Case reveals major differences between Auckland and the government &#124; Mike Lee &#8211; Waitemata and Gulf Ward Councillor</title>
		<link>http://www.bettertransport.org.nz/2010/11/rod-oram-exposes-economic-fallacy-of-puford-toll-road/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Release of CBD Rail Link Business Case reveals major differences between Auckland and the government &#124; Mike Lee &#8211; Waitemata and Gulf Ward Councillor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 02:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bettertransport.org.nz/?p=1465#comment-135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://www.bettertransport.org.nz/2010/11/rod-oram-exposes-economic-fallacy-of-puford-toll-road/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.bettertransport.org.nz/2010/11/rod-oram-exposes-economic-fallacy-of-puford-toll-road/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bettertransport.org.nz/2010/11/rod-oram-exposes-economic-fallacy-of-puford-toll-road/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Steven Joyce Defends Roads Of National Significance by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.bettertransport.org.nz/2010/11/steven-joyce-defends-roads-of-national-significance/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bettertransport.org.nz/?p=1470#comment-134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://transportblog.co.nz/2010/11/28/joyce-gets-defensive/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Josh Arbury points out&lt;/a&gt; that Minister Joyce is spinning the numbers:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Joyce then goes on to tell various lies about investments in the rail network – claiming that $4.5 billion will be spent on turning around KiwiRail (only $750 million is being spent by government on that, the rest is to come from within KiwiRail); claiming that the current government is spending $1.6 billion on Auckland’s rail network (the $600 million Project DART was funded in the 2006 budget, $500 million for electrification infrastructure was funded in the 2007 budget and the $500 million for rolling stock is the subject of a lengthy ongoing debate and may be paid for by Auckland ratepayers in the end.)&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2010/11/28/joyce-gets-defensive/" rel="nofollow">Josh Arbury points out</a> that Minister Joyce is spinning the numbers:</p>
<blockquote><p>Joyce then goes on to tell various lies about investments in the rail network – claiming that $4.5 billion will be spent on turning around KiwiRail (only $750 million is being spent by government on that, the rest is to come from within KiwiRail); claiming that the current government is spending $1.6 billion on Auckland’s rail network (the $600 million Project DART was funded in the 2006 budget, $500 million for electrification infrastructure was funded in the 2007 budget and the $500 million for rolling stock is the subject of a lengthy ongoing debate and may be paid for by Auckland ratepayers in the end.)</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Steven Joyce Defends Roads Of National Significance by cateye</title>
		<link>http://www.bettertransport.org.nz/2010/11/steven-joyce-defends-roads-of-national-significance/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>cateye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 11:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bettertransport.org.nz/?p=1470#comment-133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can someone please please please email this to Rod Oram (or other political commentators) along with some of the other facts regarding Joyces fictitious remarks so he can destroy him next sunday?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone please please please email this to Rod Oram (or other political commentators) along with some of the other facts regarding Joyces fictitious remarks so he can destroy him next sunday?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trams Make Waterfront Comeback by masstranz</title>
		<link>http://www.bettertransport.org.nz/2010/06/trams-make-waterfront-comeback/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>masstranz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 00:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bettertransport.org.nz/?p=1283#comment-93</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am glad that they adopted it, but it really only goes a few blocks! I hope that it&#039;s worth the trouble, and not used in politics against the yea-sayers as a project that did little to alleviate transportation woes. 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portland_Streetcar
http://vintagetrolleys.com/
Apologies for harping on about Portland, but...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad that they adopted it, but it really only goes a few blocks! I hope that it&#8217;s worth the trouble, and not used in politics against the yea-sayers as a project that did little to alleviate transportation woes.<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portland_Streetcar" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portland_Streetcar</a><br />
<a href="http://vintagetrolleys.com/" rel="nofollow">http://vintagetrolleys.com/</a><br />
Apologies for harping on about Portland, but&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.495 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-05-19 10:38:55 -->
