kaiwhara wrote:Yes, only 1 Pan per unit, on the M1 car only.
On LGVs, only the rear pantograph is raised, avoiding amplification of the oscillations created by the front pantograph.
pshemko wrote:Will EMUs have a 'forward' and 'backward' travelling direction with preference to go one way or are they going to be completely bi-directional? I've noticed in other rail operations around a world that if an EMU or a loco has 2 pantographs almost always the second one from front (or travelling direction) is up, whilst the first one is down.
Andrew wrote:Is that normal or just high speed rail?On LGVs, only the rear pantograph is raised, avoiding amplification of the oscillations created by the front pantograph.
pshemko wrote:kaiwhara wrote:Yes, only 1 Pan per unit, on the M1 car only.
Will EMUs have a 'forward' and 'backward' travelling direction with preference to go one way or are they going to be completely bi-directional? I've noticed in other rail operations around a world that if an EMU or a loco has 2 pantographs almost always the second one from front (or travelling direction) is up, whilst the first one is down.
Andrew wrote:Contrasting that is this:
I may have said it before but I'm sure the pantograph salesman must have retired on that deal. Two pantos per car.
geoff_184 wrote:And being America, where the safety nazi's haven't taken over, they don't even bother with even basic road markings - just trains and cars and people all mixing it up on the same tarmac. Awesome!
And being America, where the safety nazi's haven't taken over, they don't even bother with even basic road markings - just trains and cars and people all mixing it up on the same tarmac. Awesome!
geoff_184 wrote:And being America, where the safety nazi's haven't taken over, they don't even bother with even basic road markings - just trains and cars and people all mixing it up on the same tarmac. Awesome!
I have to say this final train design and the livery look pretty snazzy. The AT logo's not too bad either if a bit American-looking.geoff_184 wrote:
The comments may be dumb as you'd reasonably expect.Nick R wrote:I agree with you that his argument is crap, but it's a blog, not a parliamentary inquiry. It doesn't have to be factual and perfect. I've written plenty of opinion on there myself, some of it uninformed and unresearched and I've been hit up for it. They can't all be zingers!
Daniel wrote:I have to say this final train design and the livery look pretty snazzy. The AT logo's not too bad either if a bit American-looking.
Nothing for anyone to complain about here.
Guess that must mean that no livery could make the ADK's and ADL's look good. What a difference a decent-looking train makes.geoff_184 wrote:It's really just the MAXX livery though, with the addition of a red stripe (which funnily enough the original MAXX livery as applied to ADL's 806 and 807 also had, albeit a bit more orange). So you could almost say the EMU's will have the 2003-era MAXX livery! All that's missing is a little Pukeko sticking his head out of the AT circle
I only see a vague similarity with Melbourne's "Metro Trains Melbourne" livery.odaikorob wrote:I absolutely hate the colour scheme. Its exactly like that in use in Melbourne, Brisbane and Kuala Lumpur.
geoff_184 wrote:All that's missing is a little Pukeko sticking his head out of the AT circle
dpalenski wrote:geoff_184 wrote:All that's missing is a little Pukeko sticking his head out of the AT circle
Man we should bring him back. Properly the greatest part of the original MAXX brand was the Pukeko and I'm sure Cathy Casey would love it.
vworp wrote:dpalenski wrote:geoff_184 wrote:All that's missing is a little Pukeko sticking his head out of the AT circle
Man we should bring him back. Properly the greatest part of the original MAXX brand was the Pukeko and I'm sure Cathy Casey would love it.
Amen. Perhaps a Facebook page should be started. I doubt it'd get much momentum. That Pukeko was o-for-awesome

Return to Auckland Transport Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests