Auckland Electric Trains (EMU) Progress

General discussion forum for Auckland transport issues.
Forum rules
Please be courteous and factual. Remember that it is entirely normal for others to disagree with you. Forum moderators reserve the right to restrict access in the event of offensive behaviour (including trolling).
No commercial postings. This will result in user deletion.
Please stay on topic and remind other contributors to stay on topic.
No gratuitous profanity. "Gratuitous" is decided on a case by case basis.
Please report posts that you consider offensive instead of posting about it in the topic. Any comments regarding moderation should be confined to About This Forum.

Re: Auckland EMU progress

Postby kaiwhara » Tue Jul 24, 2012 3:20 am

Yes, only 1 Pan per unit, on the M1 car only.
Grumpy since 2006...
User avatar
kaiwhara
Moderator
 
Posts: 4797
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2009 11:25 am
Location: Ask Train Control!

Re: Auckland EMU progress

Postby pshemko » Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:17 am

kaiwhara wrote:Yes, only 1 Pan per unit, on the M1 car only.


Will EMUs have a 'forward' and 'backward' travelling direction with preference to go one way or are they going to be completely bi-directional? I've noticed in other rail operations around a world that if an EMU or a loco has 2 pantographs almost always the second one from front (or travelling direction) is up, whilst the first one is down.
kind regards
Pshem
User avatar
pshemko
Trainee Transport Geek
 
Posts: 163
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 9:46 pm

Re: Auckland EMU progress

Postby Andrew » Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:41 am

Is that normal or just high speed rail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TGV#Power_supply

On LGVs, only the rear pantograph is raised, avoiding amplification of the oscillations created by the front pantograph.
“People, not vehicles, are the economic lifeblood of a successful, vibrant city.” - Jahn Gehl to Auckland City Council, September 2010
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them." - Albert Einstein
User avatar
Andrew
Moderator
 
Posts: 3597
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 9:31 am
Location: Beachbirkengleneskdaleheadfieldhaven.

Re: Auckland EMU progress

Postby Nick R » Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:24 am

pshemko wrote:Will EMUs have a 'forward' and 'backward' travelling direction with preference to go one way or are they going to be completely bi-directional? I've noticed in other rail operations around a world that if an EMU or a loco has 2 pantographs almost always the second one from front (or travelling direction) is up, whilst the first one is down.

Andrew wrote:Is that normal or just high speed rail?
On LGVs, only the rear pantograph is raised, avoiding amplification of the oscillations created by the front pantograph.


I do know that Melbourne trams only have one pantograph and run it leading or trailing just depending on which way it's facing. Maybe the oscillation thing is only a concern at high speeds.
I should still listen to Doloras.
User avatar
Nick R
Uber Transit Geek
 
Posts: 7083
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 8:08 pm
Location: Halfway between K Rd station and Newton station.

Re: Auckland EMU progress

Postby kaiwhara » Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:02 am

No. Wellington quite successfully maintain only 1 Pantograph per unit, and most BR AC rolling stock only has one Pan as well, including virtually all locomotives now!

pshemko wrote:
kaiwhara wrote:Yes, only 1 Pan per unit, on the M1 car only.


Will EMUs have a 'forward' and 'backward' travelling direction with preference to go one way or are they going to be completely bi-directional? I've noticed in other rail operations around a world that if an EMU or a loco has 2 pantographs almost always the second one from front (or travelling direction) is up, whilst the first one is down.
Grumpy since 2006...
User avatar
kaiwhara
Moderator
 
Posts: 4797
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2009 11:25 am
Location: Ask Train Control!

Re: Auckland EMU progress

Postby Andrew » Tue Jul 24, 2012 1:18 pm

Contrasting that is this:



I may have said it before but I'm sure the pantograph salesman must have retired on that deal. Two pantos per car.
“People, not vehicles, are the economic lifeblood of a successful, vibrant city.” - Jahn Gehl to Auckland City Council, September 2010
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them." - Albert Einstein
User avatar
Andrew
Moderator
 
Posts: 3597
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 9:31 am
Location: Beachbirkengleneskdaleheadfieldhaven.

Re: Auckland EMU progress

Postby pshemko » Tue Jul 24, 2012 1:50 pm

Andrew wrote:Contrasting that is this:



I may have said it before but I'm sure the pantograph salesman must have retired on that deal. Two pantos per car.


Clearly they're never run them at high speed, so they don't have to be worried about oscillation. Quite impressive setup though ;)
kind regards
Pshem
User avatar
pshemko
Trainee Transport Geek
 
Posts: 163
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 9:46 pm

Re: Auckland EMU progress

Postby geoff_184 » Tue Jul 24, 2012 3:43 pm

I enjoyed this one too. Quite a busy double track mainline down the street, and some of those Amtrak commuter trains appear to be doing about 50km/h. And being America, where the safety nazi's haven't taken over, they don't even bother with even basic road markings - just trains and cars and people all mixing it up on the same tarmac. Awesome!



Just imagine how many more lines we could have around Auckland if our thinking was the same as theirs.
For Auckland region train videos, visit http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoffBlackmore
User avatar
geoff_184
Uber Transit Geek
 
Posts: 7533
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 6:51 am
Location: Swansonville

Re: Auckland EMU progress

Postby john-ston » Tue Jul 24, 2012 6:37 pm

geoff_184 wrote:And being America, where the safety nazi's haven't taken over, they don't even bother with even basic road markings - just trains and cars and people all mixing it up on the same tarmac. Awesome!


Yet, America seems to have gone overboard with regulations and it has ruined everyone's life - read and weep

http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com/the-day-your-life-fell-apart/

Stay on topic - mod.
The Jeremiah of Public Transport

"You are 99.97% right" - Akarana
john-ston
Uber Transit Geek
 
Posts: 14764
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 2:02 pm
Location: Overlooking the Southern Motorway

Re: Auckland EMU progress

Postby pickle » Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:54 pm

And being America, where the safety nazi's haven't taken over, they don't even bother with even basic road markings - just trains and cars and people all mixing it up on the same tarmac. Awesome!

Unconstitutional to direct cars where they should drive on the road.
"Being penalised for bus/train interchange while parking remains free is just bloody ridiculous!"- Keg
pickle
Railfan
 
Posts: 2472
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 5:45 pm
Location: Auckland

Re: Auckland EMU progress

Postby drosophila » Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:15 pm

geoff_184 wrote:And being America, where the safety nazi's haven't taken over, they don't even bother with even basic road markings - just trains and cars and people all mixing it up on the same tarmac. Awesome!


Spend some time working there and you'll realise that health and safety has taken over, as has the monitoring of anything everyone says in case it turns out to have been made at the expense of someone in which case it's harassment.
drosophila
Railfan
 
Posts: 1117
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 4:50 am

Re: Auckland EMU progress

Postby Daniel » Sun Aug 05, 2012 2:45 pm

geoff_184 wrote:Image
I have to say this final train design and the livery look pretty snazzy. The AT logo's not too bad either if a bit American-looking.
Nothing for anyone to complain about here.
"I don't like it when posters here seem to be impugning the professionalism or even the good faith of PT planners and staff, and I wish that wasn't allowed on this forum" - Doloras.
Daniel
Certified Trainspotter
 
Posts: 2972
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:41 am
Location: Sydney

Re: Auckland EMU progress

Postby Daniel » Sun Aug 05, 2012 3:04 pm

Nick R wrote:I agree with you that his argument is crap, but it's a blog, not a parliamentary inquiry. It doesn't have to be factual and perfect. I've written plenty of opinion on there myself, some of it uninformed and unresearched and I've been hit up for it. They can't all be zingers!
The comments may be dumb as you'd reasonably expect.

But I'd expect the authors of the blogs to be a bit better informed and less rude than that Patrick Reynolds is. Just my opinion but he strikes me as a negative whinger who wouldn't be satisfied no matter what.
"I don't like it when posters here seem to be impugning the professionalism or even the good faith of PT planners and staff, and I wish that wasn't allowed on this forum" - Doloras.
Daniel
Certified Trainspotter
 
Posts: 2972
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:41 am
Location: Sydney

Re: Auckland EMU progress

Postby geoff_184 » Sun Aug 05, 2012 10:28 pm

Daniel wrote:I have to say this final train design and the livery look pretty snazzy. The AT logo's not too bad either if a bit American-looking.
Nothing for anyone to complain about here.


It's really just the MAXX livery though, with the addition of a red stripe (which funnily enough the original MAXX livery as applied to ADL's 806 and 807 also had, albeit a bit more orange). So you could almost say the EMU's will have the 2003-era MAXX livery! All that's missing is a little Pukeko sticking his head out of the AT circle :)

I do quite like it, but in light of the dropping of the MAXX brand, I'm not sure if it's the one to go with.
For Auckland region train videos, visit http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoffBlackmore
User avatar
geoff_184
Uber Transit Geek
 
Posts: 7533
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 6:51 am
Location: Swansonville

Re: Auckland EMU progress

Postby Daniel » Sun Aug 05, 2012 10:39 pm

geoff_184 wrote:It's really just the MAXX livery though, with the addition of a red stripe (which funnily enough the original MAXX livery as applied to ADL's 806 and 807 also had, albeit a bit more orange). So you could almost say the EMU's will have the 2003-era MAXX livery! All that's missing is a little Pukeko sticking his head out of the AT circle :)
Guess that must mean that no livery could make the ADK's and ADL's look good. What a difference a decent-looking train makes. ;)
"I don't like it when posters here seem to be impugning the professionalism or even the good faith of PT planners and staff, and I wish that wasn't allowed on this forum" - Doloras.
Daniel
Certified Trainspotter
 
Posts: 2972
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:41 am
Location: Sydney

Re: Auckland EMU progress

Postby odaikorob » Sun Aug 05, 2012 11:44 pm

I absolutely hate the colour scheme. Its exactly like that in use in Melbourne, Brisbane and Kuala Lumpur. Totally unimaginative and what's worse, its no change at all to what is in use in AKL right now. Cant stand the AT logo either. The whole train external colouring and logo design is unbeliveably amateurish and a complete embarrassment. Why, why, why, when NZ is good at product design and packaging for export overseas, do we then shoot ourselves in the foot everytime domestically with crap such as this?? Yes, I accept that yellow is necessary for the train fronts for safety reasons but for gods sake, we can be far more imaginative with the rest of the external colouring and still adhere to colouring that facilitates safe embarkation / disembarkation. Let me guess...is the interior colouring / design a similar trainwreck??....yellow coloured poles, cheap looking blue seats and no overhead luggage racks??
横浜出身、電車男

間もなく、電車がまいります。危ないですから黄色線の内側へ下がってお待ち下さい。
User avatar
odaikorob
Trainee Transport Geek
 
Posts: 454
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 3:40 pm
Location: Auckland

Re: Auckland EMU progress

Postby Daniel » Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:21 am

odaikorob wrote:I absolutely hate the colour scheme. Its exactly like that in use in Melbourne, Brisbane and Kuala Lumpur.
I only see a vague similarity with Melbourne's "Metro Trains Melbourne" livery.

Although now it's been mentioned the seating covers are not very good. It's about the only thing I think could be greatly improved and have one of those rich BR-style moquette's would be nice but the to be honest I don't think it matters that much.
Last edited by Daniel on Mon Aug 06, 2012 10:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
"I don't like it when posters here seem to be impugning the professionalism or even the good faith of PT planners and staff, and I wish that wasn't allowed on this forum" - Doloras.
Daniel
Certified Trainspotter
 
Posts: 2972
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:41 am
Location: Sydney

Re: Auckland EMU progress

Postby dpalenski » Mon Aug 06, 2012 9:22 am

geoff_184 wrote:All that's missing is a little Pukeko sticking his head out of the AT circle :)



Man we should bring him back. Properly the greatest part of the original MAXX brand was the Pukeko and I'm sure Cathy Casey would love it.
Tumbling on Tumblr http://dpalenski.tumblr.com/

The Gray ghost,Iron paw strikes again!!
User avatar
dpalenski
Railfan
 
Posts: 1758
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 12:56 pm
Location: Sunnynook via Totaravale

Re: Auckland EMU progress

Postby vworp » Mon Aug 06, 2012 9:27 am

dpalenski wrote:
geoff_184 wrote:All that's missing is a little Pukeko sticking his head out of the AT circle :)



Man we should bring him back. Properly the greatest part of the original MAXX brand was the Pukeko and I'm sure Cathy Casey would love it.

Amen. Perhaps a Facebook page should be started. I doubt it'd get much momentum. That Pukeko was o-for-awesome :P
"I have even seriously considered going down the mail-order bride path." -- john-ston
"While we're at it let's say cars emit rainbows and fairy dust..." -- pcuser42 (on idiots calling cycling 'bad' for the environment)

Formerly darkie
User avatar
vworp
Everything Fanboy
 
Posts: 1861
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 3:31 pm
Location: Papakura Station

Re: Auckland EMU progress

Postby dpalenski » Mon Aug 06, 2012 9:33 am

vworp wrote:
dpalenski wrote:
geoff_184 wrote:All that's missing is a little Pukeko sticking his head out of the AT circle :)



Man we should bring him back. Properly the greatest part of the original MAXX brand was the Pukeko and I'm sure Cathy Casey would love it.

Amen. Perhaps a Facebook page should be started. I doubt it'd get much momentum. That Pukeko was o-for-awesome :P


Nah I'll wait for my manager to cycle into whether I'm working and ask also get Cathy Casey behind it.

First jumpers and now Pukeko's what am I doing :)

edit: he almost looks like today's AT Ambassador with that blue vest. Back then from old photos I've seen we wore shirts with him on it.

Image

Click to view full size
Tumbling on Tumblr http://dpalenski.tumblr.com/

The Gray ghost,Iron paw strikes again!!
User avatar
dpalenski
Railfan
 
Posts: 1758
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 12:56 pm
Location: Sunnynook via Totaravale

PreviousNext

Return to Auckland Transport Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests