john-ston wrote:I have heard a Ja whistle on a Sunday at home before - and I live about a kilometre away from the railway line. Back when I was at Uni, I would sometimes hear a DC accelerating while waiting at the Princes Street/Waterloo Quadrant/Kitchener Street/Bowen Avenue lights.
KiwiRob wrote:rail_up wrote:
The CRL will, like the rest of the Auckland network, be electrified. This means quiet, pollution-free trains. No smog, poisonous fumes, belching smoke or loud noises on the streets or in areas where pedestrians are walking etc.
Quiet have you never been anywhere near and electric train, they may be quietish in the station but once moving they are just as noisy as diesels, the loudest noise is the steel wheels on steel tracks. I don't think there's much if any difference in noise between diesel and electric once the trains are in motion.
rail_up wrote:[Higher frequencies such as those produced by the flanges squealing on the tracks do not cause the same 'pollution' effects
Riggles wrote:Why are they last 3 pages of this thread talking about noisy trains? I don't recall that being one of the Mayors plans.
If your going to go off topic you could at least talk about Halal meat.
eurokiwi78 wrote:What were the respective mayoral candidates' policies towards Halal meat?
doloras wrote:Knowing John Banks, he would preach loudly about the wickedness of Islam while owning a chain of halal butcheries.
doloras wrote:Knowing John Banks, he would preach loudly about the wickedness of Islam while owning a chain of halal butcheries.
Two-thirds oppose mayor's proposal for rates increases
Aucklanders are not impressed by Mayor Len Brown's plans to increase rates by nearly 5 per cent a year over the next decade, nor do they want him to extend the Manukau policy of free swimming pools in Manukau to the rest of the Super City.
kaiwhara wrote:And you arrived at this assumption how?
Riggles wrote:doloras wrote:Knowing John Banks, he would preach loudly about the wickedness of Islam while owning a chain of halal butcheries.
Just remember he didn't lie, he just forgot that he attends the local Mosque 4 times a day.
Riggles wrote:kaiwhara wrote:And you arrived at this assumption how?
Well if people are asked the question, "would you like to pay 5% more in your rates?" the number of people what would go "oh yes please that sounds like a great idea, can you charge me 10% more?" would be next to none.
They would also most likely say, "I pay enough in rates and taxes already, why don't you just stop paying the politicians so much and then we would have more than enough money".
Even once told however most people would be of the opinion that the amount they currently pay in taxes and rates is more than enough. Every time in the past people have been given the choice of more money in their pocket or the greater good the majority have gone for their own pocket.Andrew wrote:The more intelligent amongst us would ask "What are those rates being spent on" rather than being entirely self-centred about it.
jarbury wrote:I may be mistaken but I am pretty sure rate increases were much higher under the old Councils. Plus we can at least count ourselves lucky not to live in the Kaipara District.
Return to Auckland Transport Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest