QuintinH wrote:I know this may be a bit visionary for the current politicians in the Waikato, Auckland and Bay of Plenty regions. But I would like to see solid steps taken towards a regional rail transport network that links up Auckland, Hamilton, Tauranga and Rotorua with modern diesel rail cars. I can see this network being used both as a commuter system for those working in the main centres as well as a general transport in preference to private car and bus. Obviously the first step is to re-establish the Hamilton to Auckland Commuter service. I applaud those putting in the work to get this off the ground again.
QuintinH wrote:But imporved bus services to Rototuna, Rotokauri and the the new peacoks subdivions should be high on the agenda, especially with the real growth that is occuring there. Hamilton is projected to increase in population by about 50,000 in 30 years and at the moment these subdivions will be taking most of that growth. Bus priority at lights and along the main arterials plus modern confortable buses and I think a lot of residents will get out of thier cars. Of course the other factor is that lots of workers go to te Rapa or frankton for work and the buses are currently on a spoke system, maybe a couple of extra circular routes would help patronage. But then this post is sliding off the topic of the underground station and heading more towards PT strategy for Hamilton so I will stop here.
Daniel wrote:But if a decent system was built don't you think patronage could become popular?ka9102 wrote:A light rail system for Hamilton,what for? Whats the population there? The buses are almost empty during off peaks times what makes you think the Light rail can be a success? and the owner and operators of the light rail? city council? Dream on.....
There are cities with populations smallr than Hamilton with successful light rail systems. Examples: Norrkopping.ka9102 wrote:Daniel wrote:But if a decent system was built don't you think patronage could become popular?ka9102 wrote:A light rail system for Hamilton,what for? Whats the population there? The buses are almost empty during off peaks times what makes you think the Light rail can be a success? and the owner and operators of the light rail? city council? Dream on.....
A decent system does not have to be light rail,an imporved bus or heavy rail infrastructure could also be considered as a decent system.
Hamilton just do not have enough population to warrant the light rail system a sucess.
Daniel wrote:There are cities with populations smallr than Hamilton with successful light rail systems. Examples: Norrkopping.
And I have never disagreed with with this, just your justification on population size alone. To say that Hamilton does not have the population size can be disproven with my example.ka9102 wrote:I reiterate again,every country has different situations,It does not matter what oversea countries have,its totally irrelevant to us,we need to find a solution that may suit NZ best.
Yeah... according to you. Now, if youre going to make this statement and expect people to take it seriously you should back it up further.ka9102 wrote:At moment Light rail is not an option,they are extremely expensive we can not afford to waste money on something that can not even be assured!!There aren't enough evidences to assure the success of hamilton light rail.
ka9102 wrote:Daniel,you'd better stop spreading your little idea of having light rails in every NZ city.That's a ludicrous fantasy.
Well first of all Sociology has never been in any nations secondary school curriculum, if you didn't drop out after 5th form you might know that. And if you'd stay on the University you might appreciate an analysis along the lines of the science sociology would have nothing to back up your opinion. Perhaps you could have learnt some proper grammar too.ka9102 wrote:I'd suggest you go back to secondary school to learn some basic sociology this is an "Adult site" so may not be suitable for ur kiddies![]()
Jonthekiwi wrote:Hey KA9102,
I would say that with your type of thinking is exactly why NZ is so behind in rail and light rail. READ REALLY FAR BEHIND!
Somehow you have the typical kiwi mantra of what works overseas won't work here. You have no solid reasons why, as there are compeling reasons why it would work. Why should we accept spending billions of roads with dubious benefits, yet not spend on light rail or heavy rail infrastructure, which in every city which uses it in NZ has been a HUGE success? Read HUGE SUCCESS!
Hamilton has the right sized population, and having studied it before making a presention to Environment Waikato I can tell you it is perfectly rip for light rail and a mixture of heavy rail. You arguements simply are irrational and don't stand up, what so ever.
PS .. can you go and live overseas for a few years? It really helps.
Daniel wrote:And I have never disagreed with with this, just your justification on population size alone. To say that Hamilton does not have the population size can be disproven with my example.ka9102 wrote:I reiterate again,every country has different situations,It does not matter what oversea countries have,its totally irrelevant to us,we need to find a solution that may suit NZ best.
Now I've debunked this point you could divulge or elaborate further on how Hamilton still remains too small... in your opinion.Yeah... according to you. Now, if youre going to make this statement and expect people to take it seriously you should back it up further.ka9102 wrote:At moment Light rail is not an option,they are extremely expensive we can not afford to waste money on something that can not even be assured!!There aren't enough evidences to assure the success of hamilton light rail.ka9102 wrote:Daniel,you'd better stop spreading your little idea of having light rails in every NZ city.That's a ludicrous fantasy.![]()
Okay. I'm not quite sure how you came to this conclusion. I've only advocated it for two cities, and I'm not even advocating it for Hamilton, just trying to hear both sides of the story. I've got no desire to see light rail in... for example Christchurch. Could it be the reaction of someone feeling under threat? or someone whose feeling their job driving buses might be under threat.Well first of all Sociology has never been in any nations secondary school curriculum, if you didn't drop out after 5th form you might know that. And if you'd stay on the University you might appreciate an analysis along the lines of the science sociology would have nothing to back up your opinion. Perhaps you could have learnt some proper grammar too.ka9102 wrote:I'd suggest you go back to secondary school to learn some basic sociology this is an "Adult site" so may not be suitable for ur kiddies![]()
That sentence doesn't make grammatical sense.ka9102 wrote:Daniel wrote:dont know that this is what we called-------spam
Return to North Island Transport Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest