PTNZ wrote:Does anyone have the figure for the percentage of the total passenger load that Palmerston North contributes to the route?
john-ston wrote:PTNZ wrote:Does anyone have the figure for the percentage of the total passenger load that Palmerston North contributes to the route?
IIRC, it is about half a carriage load. The vast majority of the traffic is from Levin, Otaki and Waikanae.
Rail-it wrote:I'd be concerned about it's future if that is the average loading. That's not even a full bus load.
john-ston wrote:Rail-it wrote:I'd be concerned about it's future if that is the average loading. That's not even a full bus load.
That is only the loading from Palmerston North though. Bear in mind also that Palmerston North is the next place after Wellington with the sort of facilities that are necessary for such a service; so the Capital Connection would have to continue to have a Palmerston North terminus for the foreseeable future.
I would personally be keen for there to be two additional services as far as Levin, perhaps using RM30, with a mid morning and mid afternoon run.
All the cross sections in the recent Peka Peka - Otaki Expressway consultation document featured a Matangi EMU on the railway line. A semi-secret pro-rail plot by the NZTA or just a bit of 'PT wash'?john-ston wrote:Given the success of the extension to Waikanae, I wonder how long it will be before we see EMUs doing regular runs to Otaki?
john-ston wrote:Given the success of the extension to Waikanae, I wonder how long it will be before we see EMUs doing regular runs to Otaki? Heck, if the Capital Connection is doing better than it used to do, then I wonder if we should be pushing for the Ferns to do a supplementary run to Levin in the peak.
geoff_184 wrote:In 2007 Ontrack offered to extend the wires to Otaki for just $15m extra, on top of the $600m approved for Waikanae and the new trains. Obviously GWRC didn't accept the offer, but I wonder if in hindsight they now regret not doing so? Seems to me to be a missed opportunity. The cost looks very reasonable.
john-ston wrote:geoff_184 wrote:In 2007 Ontrack offered to extend the wires to Otaki for just $15m extra, on top of the $600m approved for Waikanae and the new trains. Obviously GWRC didn't accept the offer, but I wonder if in hindsight they now regret not doing so? Seems to me to be a missed opportunity. The cost looks very reasonable.
I can understand why the Greater Wellington Regional Council decided not to extend electrification - I don't imagine that Otaki would have provided enough passengers in the short term to justify it, even with the $15 million cost of stringing up the wires.
Return to Wellington Transport Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests